Alistair Darling made a £1.7bn swoop on tax avoidance schemes in his first
as he targeted aggressive planning to shore up the hole left by flagging
The chancellor introduced no fewer than 11 anti-avoidance measures that will
hit businesses for more than £600m this year and £1.7bn by 2010. This is more
than double the £780m the Treasury said it would raise from anti-avoidance
measures last year.
With the net changes to business taxation, which will see the corporate tax
rate fall to 28% and capital allowances scrapped, raising an extra £1.4bn for
the Treasury, British business is facing a tax bill £2bn higher than last year.
Experts said some of the anti-avoidance measures were to be expected, but
expressed outrage at legislation clamping down on controlled foreign companies.
The rules announced in the Budget will hit controlled foreign companies with
voting shares held in off-shore trusts and prevent corporates from structuring
CFCs as partnerships. The moves are expected to net £400m for the government by
‘The CFC crackdown was particularly surprising. The structures that have been
blocked are widely used and the changes are very unhelpful,’ said Bill Dodwell,
head of tax policy at Deloitte.
North Sea oil operators were also hit particularly hard by the avoidance
crackdown. The industry will be paying £490m in extra tax by 2010 after the
chancellor changed rules for the tax treatment of management expenses.
Patrick Stevens, tax partner at Ernst & Young, said anti-avoidance
measures showed that HM Revenue & Customs’ disclosure regime was working
‘The hit count and money raised is higher than before. The disclosure regime is
doing its job.
‘The money raised is a justification for having the regime in place,’ Stevens
Go to our
08 special report
Making Tax Digital will impose significant additional tax compliance costs on small businesses for little or no medium term benefit, tax and small business experts told MPs
MHA MacIntyre Hudson has partnered with cloud accounting software provider Xero ahead of the government’s requirement for digital records
The drive towards a fully digital tax regime is an admirable one, but mandation is simply wrong, according to one of the UK's most senior tax technology practitioners - Paul Aplin
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...