New rules ‘taxing’

New rules 'taxing'

Deloittes demands a simpler system after call for clarification of who will be taxed, and why, according to the Scottish Parliament's proposed revenue-raising powers.

Complicated government plans to force tax payers who spend ation of who will be taxed, and why, according to the Scottish Parliament’s proposed revenue-raising powers. considerable amount of their time in Scotland to keep on-going records of their whereabouts should be ditched, Deloitte & Touche claimed this week.

The demand came as the clauses of the Scotland Bill dealing with the new Scottish Parliament’s tax-varying powers are set to be debated on Tuesday.

From April 2000, the Scottish Parliament can vary the basic rate of tax for ‘Scottish’ taxpayers by up to 3p. If the full 3p tax was levied it could cost taxpayers up to #660 each.

But David Sinton, head of Deloittes’ tax in Edinburgh, said the new rules would be too complex. Under the current proposals, a person who is resident in the UK, and either has a principal home in Scotland or spends as many days in Scotland as he spends elsewhere in the UK is defined as a Scottish taxpayer.

‘This day-count test is complex, costly and burdensome for the government and individual taxpayers,’ Sinton said.

‘It is also likely to create numerous anomalies.’

Sinton demanded a simpler test, suggesting: ‘The tax test that counts the days spent in Scotland should be abolished and replaced by a test based solely on the location of the principal home, building on the default test already incorporated in the Scotland Bill.’

Under Sinton’s proposal, the tax-varying powers would only apply to taxpayers with their principal home in Scotland. ‘This means people can budget for the tax with reasonable certainty and employers know when to deduct the tax, as their status is established at the beginning of the year.’

The system would also eliminate a host of problems thrown up by cross-border workers – those who commute to Scotland – and workers on North Sea oil rigs. Sinton added the scheme would cut compliance costs and allow the Inland Revenue to operate a Scottish tax system based largely on home addresses.

Related Articles

Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

Legal Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

Personal Tax Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

Personal Tax Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

4m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

Personal Tax What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

7m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

9m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

9m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer