PracticePeople In PracticeCIMA council rejects merger as ICAEW ‘takeover’

CIMA council rejects merger as ICAEW 'takeover'

Merger proposals to create an accountancy 'super institute' have been dealt a devastating blow after it emerged that CIMA's council rejected the plan as a 'takeover'.

Link: Institutes at war over new name

As a major face-saving exercise got underway, it emerged that CIMA’s council had voted unanimously to send the plans back to the drawing board.

The news suggested that the institutes had been overly optimistic when they launched the merger plan in September, stating that it had received an ‘in principle’ yes from each of the governing Councils.

One CIMA council member told Acccountancy Age: ‘We approached this honestly from the start and said we would be in favour of consolidating the profession, but we are not prepared to accept CIMA being subsumed into the ICAEW along with everything management accounting stands for.’

Key sticking points are understood to include having The Institute of Chartered Accountants as the new name for the merged body, increased fees for CIMA members, and an electoral process that was deemed likely to produce an ICAEW-dominated council.

Determined to remain upbeat, the institutes released a joint press release entitled ‘consolidation concept approved’.

The release skirted over the fact that, while CIMA’s council continues to agree in broad principal to the ‘concept’ of consolidation, it is at loggerheads with the ICAEW over the detail.

Roland Kaye, CIMA President, said: ‘A huge amount of effort has gone into defining the shape of the new Institute. Each organisation has distinct strengths and defined interests, and it is important to get the proposals absolutely right. Our Council concluded that the current proposals did not yet recognise the distinctiveness of CIMA.’

Paul Druckman and Mike Barnes, the Presidents of the ICAEW and CIPFA, said in a joint statement: ‘These are complex discussions and we are conscious of the past history, but we are continuing to work together to identify the best possible proposition for members.’

CIPFA’s council, which was the first of the trio to meet, is believed to have backed the proposals, while the ICAEW’s meeting on 20 December was likely to have focussed on how to resolve the impasse with CIMA.

All hope now focuses on continuing discussions aimed at forging a new blueprint to put to councils, probably in February.

If the current problems can be resolved, a member vote – origianlly evisaged for ‘early to mid’-2005 – would now go ahead in the summer.

Related Articles

Moore Stephens appoints three new partners

People In Practice Moore Stephens appoints three new partners

3d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Mental Health Awareness Week: How organisations can help ensure good employee wellbeing

People In Practice Mental Health Awareness Week: How organisations can help ensure good employee wellbeing

1w Reafad Rahman
Mental Health Awareness Week 2018

People In Business Mental Health Awareness Week 2018

1w Accountancy Age, Reporters
Accountancy Age 35 under 35 2018 – last chance to enter!

People In Business Accountancy Age 35 under 35 2018 – last chance to enter!

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Women in Finance: is the future of finance female?

People In Business Women in Finance: is the future of finance female?

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Mazars announces two partner appointments, increased fee income growth

People In Practice Mazars announces two partner appointments, increased fee income growth

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

Accounting Firms British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
RSM appoints two new regional managing partners

People In Practice RSM appoints two new regional managing partners

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter