Treasury cautioned over avoidance laws

Treasury cautioned over avoidance laws

Senior politicians are poised for the launch of a legal challenge against the controversial tax avoidance legislation, introduced in the pre-Budget report.

Link: PBR: Tax avoidance measures announced

The challenge is most likely to be made under the Human Rights Act, although the legislation, which allows the principle of retrospection to be applied to tax avoidance schemes, could also fall foul of European law.

An inquiry into the pre-Budget report conducted by the House of Commons Treasury committee, picked up on legislation that outlined the Treasury’s decision to clamp down on employee-related tax avoidance schemes ‘where necessary’ with immediate effect.

‘We support the government’s determination to tackle unreasonable tax avoidance schemes, but we recognise that some experts have indicated that its approach could lead to challenge in the courts,’ said the Treasury committee report.

Tax experts have already expressed their dismay at the announcement, claiming that it would lead to the principle of retrospection being extended to other areas of the tax avoidance disclosure regime.

Guy Brannan, head of tax at City law firm Linklaters, said the legislation, which will be introduced in the 2005 finance bill, was ‘a 50/50 ball’ over whether or not it was legal. ‘But, I would say that the Inland Revenue is probably in the right,’ he said.

Brannan added that the Revenue would be playing a dangerous game if it branched out into other areas of tax with the retrospective rule. ‘If it tries to do that more widely, it is moving away from accounting with law towards accounting with what the Revenue believes the law to be,’ he said.

The Treasury committee also fired a warning shot at the government over tax receipts, saying that ‘although (tax receipts) have grown strongly by historic standards, they are emerging below forecast for the fourth consecutive year’. The committee said it was important that forecasts for tax receipts be ‘accurately constructed and avoid an over-optimistic trend’.

Meanwhile, the House of Lords came down in favour of the Revenue in an eagerly awaited case concerning capital gains tax. This was the latest in a series of blows to taxpayers concerning tax avoidance schemes. The so-called ‘flip-flop’ avoidance schemes used two separate trusts with a loan arrangement between them.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource