TaxCorporate TaxContractors face £5m CIS penalties

Contractors face £5m CIS penalties

Business face up to £5m in tax penalties if they fail to post tax returns under the new Construction Industry Scheme

The taxman has warned that only six out of ten returns have been filed on
time under the new tax regime for contractors and subcontractors.

With an estimated 150,000 contractors expected to be required to fill in
monthly returns, and penalties running at a minimum rate of £100 per month, they
could face a £5m bill when the penalty regime gets underway on 19 October.

‘Those that are late need to get it sorted now,’ said Peter Seedhouse of
PricewaterhouseCoopers.

‘We think bigger contractors have got it sorted but smaller companies advised
by accountants, we don’t believe they are getting it through.’

The new CIS scheme came into effect in April following delays to make sure
that HM Revenue & Custom’s IT systems and business’ accounting systems were
working correctly.

The penalty regime was held off for the first six months. Even if contractors
have nil returns, under the new scheme they must notify the taxman.

‘Outstanding returns include any unsubmitted since the start of the new
scheme in April 2007, including returns confirming no payments have been made
for a given month,’ said HMRC CIS reform programme director Mark de Brunner in a
letter to Accountancy Age this week. ‘Nil returns can be made very
easily over the phone.’

De Brunner said the taxman was also contacting those who have failed to file
on time to remind them of the importance of doing so to avoid a penalty.

‘It’s not too late for contractors to meet their filing obligations. But they
must act now,’ de Brunner added.

The introduction of the new scheme has proved a controversial topic in recent
years.
Despite delaying the introduction of the scheme from 2006 to 2007, advisers have

warned that the industry is unready for it.

A KPMG survey prior to the scheme’s introduction found many contractors were
not ready for its implementation, and it would be more unwieldy than the old
scheme.

The ICAEW said the scheme would cost businesses up to £280m to comply, ten
times more than Treasury estimates.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson