Often when partners are not performing it is because the younger partners are not getting their ‘sweat’ money. The words ‘I did my time, so he’ll have to do his!’ are not uncommon from the older partners – times have changed and we need to ‘get over it’ quickly.
Keeping the younger partners today requires a different way of thinking andfirst and most common one is you must pay sweat money today. From where?From the existing profits, which means that if partners are no longermoving and shaking, then we need to underpay underperformers.
The partnership agreement needs to reflect this.
Other issues that I would suggest you deal with in the partnership agreement:
- Reduce capital accounts
- Get rid of Goodwill
- Ensure there are no retiring partners pensions that need to be paid fromfuture profits
- Introduce ‘Loan stock’ for all staff which can be valued based on turnoverthereby encouraging staff motivation etc
So, answering your question directly probably means changing the partnershipagreement to meet the demands of the current business.
If partners are unwilling to change, it would suggest that they are unwilling to ensure the long-term success of the business. Would you want to work for a business that is unwilling to change a partenrship agreement that is aimed at the long-term success of the firm?
Andrew Tyrie airs views on the Finance Bill, 'Making Tax Policy Better' report, and Brexit
In our latest managing partner Q&A looking towards 2017, CVR Global's Richard Toone talks about recruitment, and the potential threat of competition from the legal sector, as key issues for the firm in the coming year
Deloitte to avoid tendering for government contracts over the next six months, to appease Theresa May following consultant's report that painted a less-than-flattering picture of Brexit plans
In our first Q&A looking towards 2017, Menzies senior partner Julie Adams flags up increasing digitisation, aligned with more hands-on consultative services, as the key mix for her practice