TaxPersonal TaxJP Morgan takes #2m VAT hit

JP Morgan takes #2m VAT hit

JP Morgan's failure to minimise its VATable supplies has created a #2m tax bill. Phillip Inman reports.

US banking giant JP Morgan has failed to limit its VAT liability after the special commissioners ruled a refurbishment of a subsidiary’s central London office was liable for a tax bill of nearly #2m.

The case, which experts believe will have widespread knock-on effects, shows the entitlement to input credit on the full supply of a service is jeopardised if a member of a VAT group moves out.

Penny Hamilton, Coopers & Lybrand’s VAT partner, said: ‘It is an important tribunal but it is not the end of the story. It relies on two judgements that are going to the House of Lords and could be overturned.’

The two cases – Kingfisher and Thorn Materials – both follow intra-VAT group transactions. Hamilton said all companies in the exempt sector, which includes banks, tried to minimise their VATable supplies and would be disappointed at the result.

Morgan’s dispute with Customs followed the refurbishment of the bank’s offices near Blackfriars Bridge in 1994. A previously dormant company called JP Morgan Trading and Finance (MTF) was put in charge of the refurbishment because it doubted the financial stability of the property developers.

JP Morgan Property Development, a new member of the VAT group, carried out the works. Morgan Guarantee Trust company, a subsidiary that wanted the office space, then set up a series of leases with MTF.

The dispute centred on Section 43 of the VAT Act 1994 which Price Waterhouse, acting for the bank, said was clear in its support of the bank’s case. Chris Tailby, a partner in PW’s Birmingham office, said the law said that supplies within a VAT group will be disregarded for the purposes of VAT.

The commissioners agreed that ‘on first reading the natural and ordinary meaning of the Act, the transaction should be disregarded’.

But they said the transactions went against the spirit of the EU’s Sixth Directive and highlighted another case, called Svenska, which they argued showed ‘an intra-group transaction is not necessarily devoid of VAT consequences’.

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

3d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter