TaxCorporate TaxKPMG plays down charges over illegal tax schemes

KPMG plays down charges over illegal tax schemes

KPMG says alleged promotion of illegal tax shelters was part of a general climate of abusive tax avoidance in the UK and US in the late 1990s

KPMG will defend any criminal charges laid against the firm over its alleged
promotion of illegal tax shelters by arguing that use of the schemes was part of
a general climate of abusive tax avoidance in the UK and US in the late 1990s.

It emerged last week that the US Justice Department was considering charges
against KPMG over the sale of tax schemes in the late 1990s, raising fears that
the firm could be threatened with extinction, like Andersen in relation to
Enron, if it was convicted.

Senior figures at KPMG believe the firm may be taking the rap for a culture
of widespread tax avoidance that prevailed in the late 1990s, Accountancy
Age
has learnt.

That trend even spread to the UK. ‘Some of the schemes in the UK went too
far,’ sources close to the firm said.

The news of a possible indictment was first published by the Wall Street
Journal on Thursday in an apparent leak by the US authorities.

Sources claim none of the facts involved in the case is new. An insider said
that ‘large amounts of money were being made on equities’ in the late 1990s and
clients were demanding the schemes.

KPMG only became involved quite late on. It is currently briefing clients and
partners that there is no threat of meltdown, after investigators in the US
threatened it with criminal charges.

‘KPMG is in very good shape financially and has no major cases outstanding
against it globally. It has a fantastic reputation, particularly in the UK,’ the
source said.

Privately, senior figures have been telling clients that KPMG feels it may
have been treated more aggressively because it was initially unco-operative with
US authorities. Reports in the US also suggested that KPMG’s statement in
response to the allegations, which admitted to ‘unlawful conduct’ by former
partners, might be used in civil action against KPMG’s clients.

The firm is looking to settle with the US Department of Justice.

Reports at the weekend suggested that KPMG may have to pay a penalty of
between £50m and £150m to resolve the dispute.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson