Banking group attacks IFRS with double set of accounts

Banking group attacks IFRS with double set of accounts

HBOS, the banking group, intends to publish two sets of accounts for the foreseeable future in order to make the value of its new investment business comprehensible to investors, it said in a blast at international financial reporting standards

In announcing its annual results the banking giant presented its investment
business figures under embedded value criteria in addition to IFRS requirements.

Analysts backed the group’s move this week, saying that the IFRS valuation
methods were ‘misleading.’

The embedded value (EV) rules mean that
HBOS can provide more detail
on the value of contracts with future expected revenues.

IFRS only allows for the recording of the revenues once they have been
accrued.

Ian Gordon of Dresdner Kleinwort said: ‘The reported numbers under IFRS are
misleading. The move to IFRS has been unhelpful. The issue is more damaging for
HBOS than for other banks because this part of its operation is growing very
fast. IFRS overstates the profitability of businesses which have a more mature
profile. It is inappropriate to punish businesses which are growing fast.
They’ve now had to go the extra mile in providing the disclosure and it’s a
significant change of perception.’

HBOS has said that underlying profit before tax for the UK investment
business under EV parameters was £262m higher than reported under IFRS and the
contribution from new business in the UK Investment arm was £474m higher than
reported under IFRS – the full EV contribution being £245m compared to a loss of
£229m under the IFRS basis.

The full EV basis, unlike the IFRS basis, recognises profits on new business
at the point of sale with the contribution from existing business only including
changes in the value of future cashflows compared to predictions.

Under IFRS, insurance contracts are accounted for under IAS 39. In relation
to UK GAAP, this delays the recognition of profit in respect of some investment
contracts leading to significant ‘losses’ for HBOS.

Deloitte technical partner Ken Wild emphasised the need for a happy medium to
be established.

‘I think it’s great that companies are deciding to disclose both, but it
questions the way in which standards such as IAS are devised where you have
fairly robust principles such as these. I think the most useful thing is an
understanding of both elements.’

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

Professional Services Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

Accounting Firms Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

Making Tax Digital Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource