Officials claimed the need to ‘reload’ existing financial data followingthe reorganisation of 2001, which saw the Ministry of Agriculture,Fisheries and Food turn into the Department of the Environment, Foodand Rural Affairs, caused the errors.
They also had difficulties organising the information to relate todepartmental objectives instead of their functions.
Responding to a report from the influential Commons environment select Committee, the department said the complexity of the operation’lead to a breakdown in the quality assurance of the figures, which thedepartment deeply regrets.’
It promised to prevent a recurrence.
The committee was particularly scathing about the omission of data onplanned expenditure, which MPs found ‘wholly unacceptable’.
The MPs also complained about the £18.80 cost of the printed version ofthe department’s report, which they said lacked hard financial data.They said it should contain more hard facts ‘and less waffle’.
The department claimed to have complied with Treasury guidelines tostreamline the content of their report, which was nearly twice asexpensive as the Inland Revenue’s but just over half the cost of oneproduced by the Department of Transport.
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
Dr Richard Willis provides a several thousand-year history lesson of the profession, from origin to modern-day