TaxPersonal TaxHMRC warned against ‘knee-jerk’ Arctic reaction

HMRC warned against 'knee-jerk' Arctic reaction

Adivsers warn against an instant reaction from HMRC following the loss of the Arctic Systems case, while concerns loom that the law will be change to plug the tax law 'gap'

Advisers have warned the government not to make any ‘knee-jerk’ reactions to
losing the Arctic Systems tax case, including altering legislation to plug the
‘husband and wife’ decision by the House of Lords.

The Lords today ruled that Geoff and Diana Jones of Arctic Systems had
entered into a tax arrangement, but it fell into an exemption for a ‘gift’
between husband and wife.

Advisers welcomed the decision, which could have adversely affected thousands
of husband and wife businesses, but warned that the government could still look
to halt the exemption in the future.

‘The concern now is that HMRC might tinker with the legislation to plug the
gap,’ said Melissa Healy, solicitor at law firm Macfarlanes. ‘They might be
worried that advisers will see this as a green light for husband-and-wife or
civil partners’ businesses to avoid National Insurance contributions and higher
rates of tax.’

Francesca Lagerberg, chair of the ICAEW tax faculty Technical Committee, said
the result was a vindication of the way many owner-managed business were
operated, but called on the government to provide tax policy that was clear and
supportive of business.

‘We would urge the government not to make any knee-jerk reactions as a result
of this decision.’ said Lagerberg. ‘There is, however, a need for government to
ensure tax policy supports business and provides it with clarity and certainty.’

Grant Thornton senior partner Mike Warburton said he and others had been
telling HMRC that the case fell within the gift exemption rule, and the only way
to change the current status would be to change the law, a situation he
described as ‘unlikely to happen’.

‘If they removed the exemption it would be done at significant political
cost,’ said Warburton. ‘[The government] would be saying there should be a tax
on hard-working couples’ businesses.’

He also called on HMRC to compensate the Jones’s, as the tax battle had
effectively been a test case.

Further reading:

Arctic Systems: timeline and background on
the case

Taxpayers celebrate epic Arctic Systems
victory

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

4d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter