District Audit has defended itself against scathing criticism by saying it does train enough staff and does not rely on short-term workers from abroad to carry out public-sector audits, writes Gavin Hinks. David Prince, chief executive at District Audit, said the public-sector audit body had increased its training budget, the number of trainees was up and staff retention was good. He was responding to an attack by KPMG which, in submissions to the Commons environment subcommittee, had claimed District Audit was threatening the future of public-sector audit because it failed to invest in training and instead employed temporary foreign staff to maximise income. Appearing before the committee, Prince said: ‘We are not systematically seeking to recruit staff from overseas.’ He said staff were taken from agencies but checks were carried out to ensure they had the right visas and qualifications. He added there was no ‘extensive’ reliance on contractors to carry out audits. ‘All our audits are managed by auditors who are full-time staff,’ he said. The committee was hearing the evidence as part of its investigation into the Audit Commission and has been told by KPMG that District Audit also controls too large a share at 70% of the market. The Audit Commission will give evidence on 1 March.
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Company bosses are considering relocating operations or headquarters away from the UK following the country's decision to leave the European Union