A report by America’s General Accounting Office found the firm had fallen short of expected professional standards in its review of NASA’s 1999 accounts.
NASA had said it had $686m left over from contracts in the previous year, whereas the true amount was $42m, a discrepancy Andersen failed to pick up.
The GAO report said: ‘Andersen’s audit was characterised by excessive reliance on representation by NASA management, which led to an inappropriate assessment of risk related to the budgetary statements and resulted in the absence of any independent valuation of underlying data.’
Andersen blamed the discrepancy on a ‘good faith misinterpretation’ of the guide lines and said it raised no inference of a lack of professional care.
The second largest improvement in ‘significant’ levels of financial distress since the EU Referendum was in professional services, found research from Begbies Traynor
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned