More NewsAuditor proposals spark investor fury

Auditor proposals spark investor fury

Investors launch broadside at attempts to limit auditors' responsibilities

Investors are to pressure the government to resist proposed changes to the
company law reform bill, which they claim would dramatically cut the
responsibilities of auditors and further limit their liability exposure.

Amendments to clauses 359 and 486, relating to the duty to keep accounting
records and the duties of auditors, were proposed by opposition Treasury
spokesman Baroness Noakes earlier this month.

Investors said the amendments were a ‘stealth move’, that would radically
reduce the auditor’s duty to ensure proper books and accounting records have
been kept.

There is a fear that if such amendments are accepted, the quality of audit
service provided to shareholders would be harmed, and responsibility would be
passed almost wholly onto company directors.

Failures on accounting records have been a key factor in several scandals,
such as Parmalat, Barings and Enron, and the amendments could remove auditor
responsibility from similar cases, investors claimed.

They also feared the change could impact on the ability to judge whether a
company remains a going concern and damage the UK’s claim to have an equivalent
system to Sarbanes-Oxley in the US.

One investor called the move ‘gerrymandering phase two’, referring to last
year’s concerns over the disappearance of the true and fair view as phase one.
Some of the most influential investor groups are banding together to enter into
discussions with the government to ensure the amendments are rebuffed.

Meanwhile, the government has abandoned plans to introduce sweeping new
powers in the company law reform bill that would allow it to amend future law
without having to introduce primary legislation in Parliament.

The u-turn was revealed when Trade and Industry minister Lord Sainsbury added
his name to a Liberal Democrat amendment, deleting several clauses from the bill
during proceedings in the Lords.

To prevent the bill becoming bogged down in a row over changes to the
legislative process, ministers will instead rely on similar highly controversial
powers to change the law through secondary legislation proposed in a separate
legislative and regulatory reform bill.

Related Articles

Amazon UK halves its corporation tax bill despite increased turnover

More News Amazon UK halves its corporation tax bill despite increased turnover

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Increase in UK business confidence despite Brexit, according to ICAEW

More News Increase in UK business confidence despite Brexit, according to ICAEW

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Live blog: Spring Budget 2017

Corporate Tax Live blog: Spring Budget 2017

9m Accountancy Age editorial
The Curious Incident of the Insolvency Sector in the Light of Economic Turbulence

Insolvency The Curious Incident of the Insolvency Sector in the Light of Economic Turbulence

11m Accountancy Age editorial
Leonard Curtis called in as administrators for builders Boshers

Legal Leonard Curtis called in as administrators for builders Boshers

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
New Year Honours of 2017

Accounting Standards New Year Honours of 2017

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
"Not enough time" to implement MTD by 2018, says Tyrie

Corporate Tax "Not enough time" to implement MTD by 2018, says Tyrie

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer
Colin: A spoonful of investment...

Governance Colin: A spoonful of investment...

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer