Link: FRS 17 special report
The disturbing figures are presented in the groups preliminary results, released today, where it admitted the liability would have been as much as £1,136m if it wasn’t for a deferred tax asset.
The statement read: ‘The Group has not yet adopted FRS 17 in respect of pension benefits and under SSAP 24 charged £92m to Profit & Loss in 2002. However, had we adopted FRS 17, the net pension liability across all Group schemes at 31 December 2002 would have been £795m.
‘The deficit on all Group Schemes would have been £1,136m but taking account of a deferred tax asset, the net pension liability for all schemes would have been £795m,’ the report continued.
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements