PracticeConsultingInsolvency plan sparks lending fears.

Insolvency plan sparks lending fears.

Proposals to abolish administrative receivership unveiled under new

Insolvency practitioners say the knock-on effects of the government’s proposals to restrict or abolish administrative receivership, unveiled this week, could be disastrous.

The proposal, unveiled as part of the government’s ‘Enterprise for All’ package, was designed to put creditors on a level playing-field, and end control enjoyed by banks who appoint the receivers.

But insolvency practitioners say the proposals will not encourage enterprise, as the government hopes. Phillip Sykes, senior corporate recovery partner at Moore Stephens, said: ‘I think getting rid of administrative receivership is a mistake. It has a good record. It rescues a viable business from an insolvent corporate shell and it’s a very efficient effective process.’

John Alexander, national head of corporate recovery at PKF, said receivership is a good thing because it is quick, cheap, flexible and enables businesses to be saved an orderly manner.

Insolvency practitioners across the board warned the changes could make banks less willing to lend businesses money.

Simon Freakley, of Kroll Buchler Philips, said: ‘Bizarrely if (the chancellor) is trying to promote an enterprise culture, the steps he has taken to remove banks’ ability to appoint administrative receivers may be one that restricts it.’

Freakley said this could have a knock-on effect even on healthy companies.

‘The devil is in the detail,’ according to Roger Oldfield, president of R3, the association of business recovery professionals. ‘Unless the government changes the rules on bank security or if they go further and tinker with banks’ security rights, the results could be disastrous.’

Practitioners said Brown was attempting to deal with an old problem and the mistaken belief banks acted in their own interest.

GOVERNMENT SPINNING SLAMMED

Roger Oldfield, president of R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals, has slammed the government’s ‘spinning’ of its proposals to shake-up the insolvency regime. The government’s ‘Enterprise for All’ document implies ‘administrative receivership has no duty of care to all creditors and that is factually incorrect’, he said.

The document can be found at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer