PracticePeople In PracticeKey RIP amendment defeated in Lords

Key RIP amendment defeated in Lords

An amendment to the Regulation of Invetigatory Powers bill requiring the home secretary to sanction all warrants requesting internet decryption codes, was defeated by just one vote in the House of Lords yesterday.

The amendment, defeated by 120 votes to 119, related to a critical point in the controversy surrounding the government’s RIP Bill, which would allow law enforcement agencies to monitor internet-based communication.

Had the government been defeated it would have been its third loss on the controversial Bill.

Business leaders have said that the government’s requirement for them to hand over code keys used to encrypt sensitive business information, something no other western G8 government requires, would make the country an ecommerce pariah.

Lord Cope, who has been leading opposition to the Bill, said during the report stage debate in the House of Lords yesterday: ‘The government agencies access to keys for encrypted material is one of the most difficult aspects of this difficult Bill. It is a matter of the greatest controversy, not only in the e-community but also in the wider world of banking and commerce.’

Speaking for the government, Lord Bassam said the proposed amendment went too far and could impede criminal investigations. He introduced an alternative amendment, which was adopted, that would require a chief constable, or equivalent rank in other government agencies, to authorise orders that code keys be handed over. Previously the level had been set at superintendent.

Lord Bassam also said that an amendment requiring an independent commissioner be informed of demands for copies of code keys would be added to the Bill when it receives its third and final reading in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 19 July.

Lord Cope said this did not go far enough. He compared demanding code keys with asking permission to tap phone calls, which can only be authorised by the Home Secretary.

‘The Home Secretary is answerable to Parliament and to the nation in a way that no chief constable is answerable on operational matters,’ he said. ‘Like the tapping of telephones, it should be a ministerial responsibility.’ However, the argument convinced one peer too few and Lord Cope’s amendment was defeated by 120 votes to 119.

Some commentators believe, however, that the whole issue of government access to keys must be looked at again if ecommerce is to thrive in the UK.

‘There is still time to pause and reflect before enacting legislation that may have irreversible consequences,’ said Caspar Bowden, director of internet think-tank the Foundation for Information Policy Research.

ISP considers quitting UK over RIP bill

Critics hope snooping Bill will rest in peace

Related Articles

Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

Accounting Firms Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
CIMA elects new president

Institutes CIMA elects new president

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

Governance Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

Accounting Firms Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

Accounting Firms EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

Accounting Firms FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

Accounting Firms Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

Accounting Firms MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor