PracticeConsultingIoD attacks ‘work-life balance’ lobby

IoD attacks 'work-life balance' lobby

The Institute of Directors has said moves to increase regulation of working practices, brought about the work-life balance lobby, is damaging the competitiveness of UK business.

And it singled out small businesses and women employees as those being most adversely affected by the ‘red tape’, claiming work-life balance campaigners were in effect harming those people it was meant help.

Allegations that the work place is characterised by employee dissatisfaction, illness and stress due to long-hours, inflexible working practices and increasing job insecurity are untrue, the IoD said.

Instead it asserted that working hours in British companies were on a par with global standards, and ‘not the longest in the EU’. Furthermore, when employees work long hours they do so voluntarily, in order to earn higher wages.

Ruth Lea, head of the policy unit at the IoD, said the work-life balance lobby rarely mentioned the benefits of employment such as money, status and social contact.

While admitting that some people worked very long hours, she said: ‘They do this because they are ambitious, like the extra pay and are quite happy to do it. Good for them. It’s their choice. People who make their own choices are in control of their lives and they are healthier than those who aren’t.’

Lea went on to warn that increasing maternity rights were already discouraging employers from recruiting women, and existing regulations were already ‘turning back the clock’ for women’s job prospects.

But Petra Cook, head of policy studies at the Institute of Management, told AccountancyAge.com there was in fact support from business for increased maternity leave, provided it came with government support and allowances on the payroll.

And Cook said while long hours were still endemic in the workplace, the trend was reversing and managers were becoming resistant to enforcing long hours.

‘In 1997, our research revealed that 27% of managers were favouring employees spending more time at home than at work. In 2000, this number had risen to 32%,’ she said.

Cook also claimed that not all regulations had a negative impact on business, but were necessary to ensure basic rights for workers such as minimum wage and safe working conditions.

She did admit, however, that there was a concern among business that too much regulation could have a negative effect on UK trading.

Links

Long hours strip us all of more than libido.

Long-hours culture hurts personal lives

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer