The US departments of Treasury and Commerce have written to the European Commission (EC) complaining that the so-called ‘Safe Harbour’ agreement to ensure US companies comply with EC privacy laws is ‘unduly burdensome’. They want to delay its introduction.
Jonathan Armstrong, an associate at legal firm Eversheds, thinks the move could harm transatlantic ebusiness.
‘A lot of US companies complain heavily about EC data protection legislation,’ he said. ‘There is political momentum to prevent US companies being disadvantaged by EC laws. The US would be prepared to push pretty hard. It could be embodied into a whole new trade war.’
Safe Harbour was set up in March 2000 to exempt US companies from the EC privacy directive which prevents them exporting data about European citizens. The US is now objecting to the use of ‘standard’ contracts that it claims exceed the original agreement.
The new US administration thinks that former president Clinton allowed the EC to impose too many rules on US companies, said Jeffrey Mann, vice president at analyst Meta Group.
‘There are troublemakers in Congress. But all Safe Harbour is saying is that US companies doing business in Europe have to follow European laws,’ he said.
This article will appear in the 29 March issue of Computing
New growth opportunities in Aberdeen, North East Scotland, are being invested in by Grant Thornton
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast