House of Fraser has backed down in its dispute with a perfume supplier over its plans to raise payment terms to 75 days, Accountancy Age has learned.
The department store group agreed new payment terms with J Floris at a meeting last week. Although both refused to disclose details, the new terms are understood to be somewhere between 75 and 30 days.
The dispute surfaced after House of Fraser told J Floris and other suppliers it would be introducing new payment terms of 75 days and 3% interest from July. J Floris had said this was more than twice the length of the existing House of Fraser contract terms.
The 75-day terms are twice the length recommended by the Late Payment Act. It allows small suppliers to charge 8% interest above base rate on unpaid bills after 30 days, unless a prior agreement is reached.
Alan Toms, group finance director of J Floris, said the dispute highlighted the risks of companies trying to impose terms on suppliers. It is the most high profile late-payment dispute since the row that engulfed Rentokil Initial’s 60-day payment terms last year.
The House of Fraser’s concession to J Floris may encourage others to challenge the 75-day payment terms, according to business groups.
‘They could have a go at the payment policy,’ said a spokesman for the Federation of Small Businesses .
A House of Fraser spokesman said the dispute was not ‘an issue’ and relations with suppliers were ‘harmonious’.
A new head of solutions, Aidan Brennan, has been appointed at KPMG UK
The second largest improvement in ‘significant’ levels of financial distress since the EU Referendum was in professional services, found research from Begbies Traynor
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast