Mary Keegan, chairman of the ASB, said she came to the decision because of information showing that some UK companies are recognising their revenue too early.
She said the standard would tackle companies that book sales ‘beyond the edge of acceptable behaviour’. Keegan told Accountancy Age: ‘There have been reports of companies that recognise revenue in advance.’
The new draft requirement will be ‘loosely’ based on the revenue recognition discussion paper published in July 2001 and FRS5.
Peter Holgate, senior technical partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, and a member of the urgent issues task force, has seen the draft and warned it was ‘too short’ to answer many questions. Nevertheless, he believes it can provide interim guidance.
The draft will be principles-based rather than hard rules. This style of regulation is popular in the UK, but goes against US trends. Keegan said she chose principles-based regulation because it gives ‘the best guidance’ to different companies in different trades.
Holgate pointed out that while US revenue recognition rules are ‘very prescriptive’, there had been numerous scandals where the ‘big issue’ specifically was revenue recognition.
Peter Wyman, president of the ICAEW, agreed. ‘I don’t believe that you can put revenue recognition entirely into rules. In the end it comes down to judgement,’ he said.
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
Dr Richard Willis provides a several thousand-year history lesson of the profession, from origin to modern-day
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season