Customs threat to City

Customs threat to City

Banks and insurers stand to suffer from VAT grouping attack. Jon Bunn reports

The City of London’s pre-eminence in European financial services was threatened this week by a proposal to restrict VAT grouping to fully taxable companies.

VAT experts claimed Customs & Excise’s move, which is designed to save #400m a year, would force big banks and insurance companies to radically restructure their business operations, slashing efficiency in the process.

Barclays Bank alone has a complex VAT group consisting of about 200 entities which would require restructuring.

Chancellor Gordon Brown signalled the clampdown on perceived VAT group abuse in March’s budget. Concerned parties have until the end of September to make submissions on VAT grouping, which allows a UK business group to have a single VAT registration.

Tax professionals warned that Customs’ plan was mis-judged. Peter Jenkins, Ernst & Young’s VAT head, said: ‘If this goes through, it will reduce the competitiveness of the City. It will create an administrative nightmare and an enormous compliance burden.

‘Customs seems to be fixated with the amount of revenue at stake, but that’s ridiculous because a lot of it will disappear as businesses re-organise their group structure.’

Kevin McCormick, Barclays’ deputy tax director and chairman of the English ICA’s VAT committee, said the bank had already considered a re-organisation designed to minimise the VAT cost. ‘The proposal is similar to abolishing groups altogether for the financial sector and will increase administrative costs for us and control costs for Customs,’ he added.

‘Once Customs examines the costs of controlling groups spread all over the country, it will find that that outweighs any additional revenue.’

Tony McClenaghan, Deloitte & Touche’s national VAT partner, said the proposal was purely revenue-driven and could raise up to #1bn for the Treasury’s coffers. ‘This move would hit efficiency at a time when the City is gearing up for the euro and it would undoubtedly damage the City’s competitiveness.’

He added: ‘Customs already has a huge battery of anti-avoidance legislation to combat all the unacceptable avoidance that has taken place.’

Customs defended its controversial proposal, but a spokesman said: ‘This has been flagged up and we want to remove partially exempt businesses from VAT grouping, but if it’s concluded that making this change is not workable, it won’t go ahead.’

Related Articles

Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

Legal Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

Personal Tax Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

Personal Tax Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

4m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

Personal Tax What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

7m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

9m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

9m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer