RegulationAccounting StandardsFrench experts explain fair value during a crisis

French experts explain fair value during a crisis

The experts suggest that an 'upgraded fair value' would stop pro-cyclical effects and allow trading assets to be measured consistently with their intrinsic values

International accounting experts have backed fair-value, saying they do not
endorse views that the standard be rejected in favour of historical cost values.

The experts – Jean-François Lepetit, a member of France’s national accounting
board; PWC partner Etienne Boris and Didier Marteau, a professor at ESCP-EAP,
the European School of Management – said they strongly opposed the way fair
value is applied during a crises.

‘In these circumstances, market value is no longer fair value, in large part
because of the much reduced volume of transactions. Arbitrageurs – including
banks’ own trading desks and hedge funds – withdraw from the trades that
normally deal with the temporary differences that naturally arise between the
market price of an instrument and its intrinsic value.

‘Market prices are hence squeezed by a “crisis discount” as investors also
avoid all credit assets, regardless of intrinsic quality,’ they wrote in the
FT.

The three suggested an ‘upgraded fair value’ which would stop pro-cyclical
effects of mark-to-market and to allow trading assets to be measured
consistently with their intrinsic values.

‘As soon as the accounting regulator in the country concerned considers the
“crisis discount” abnormally high, banks would be required to discontinue
mark-tom-market measurements of credit assets in their trading books that no
longer represented fair value.

‘They would switch to a fair value measurement based on a “mark-to-model”
approach using initial parameters set by the regulator, chiefly probabilities of
default and recovery rates. These data would be established using fundamental
analysis of assets’ credit quality, eliminating “crisis discount”.’

The three experts say the rule could be applied to impaired assets or
structured instruments, whose underlying assets were impaired, such as
‘subprime’ assets.

‘This approach obviously creates an accounting gain, equal to the difference
between the “upgraded fair value” and the market price. We recommend recording
this gain in the income statement and disclosing details of the adjustment in
the notes. These gains would correct the negative impact of any losses already
recognised. The earlier the regulator acts, the less significant the adjustment
to income,’ they said.

Further reading:

FRC cautions ‘inappropriate’ development of IFRS

Related Articles

Demystifying GDPR for accountants

Accounting Standards Demystifying GDPR for accountants

1w Ellen Temperton, Lewis Silkin
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
The great professional services shake-up

Accounting Standards The great professional services shake-up

3m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
What do clients actually want from an accountant?

Accounting Standards What do clients actually want from an accountant?

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

Accounting Standards Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

4m Alison Conley
Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

Accounting Standards Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

Accounting Standards The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

5m DAC Beachcroft
IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

Accounting Standards IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter