PracticeConsultingBankruptcy plans labelled ‘ridiculous’

Bankruptcy plans labelled 'ridiculous'

Insolvency experts brand plans to save bankrupts' family homes as 'ridiculous and unworkable'.

The government’s proposals to save bankrupts’ family homes by giving trustees a three-year limit to sell the property are ‘ridiculous and unworkable’, personal insolvency specialists have said.

In a committee meeting last month, trade minister Melanie Johnson said she aimed to amend the Enterprise Bill to include a provision limiting trustees in bankruptcy to just three years to sell a bankrupt’s property.

She added current practice was ‘not entirely’ consistent with the principle of giving bankrupts ‘a fresh start’.

The proposal is seen as an attempt to counter a trend by some trustees to hold on to the family home until the value of the property increases.

But specialists claim the amendment fails to recognise the difficulties trustees have in realising the family home when the debtor refuses to co-operate.

Louise Brittain, who has recently dealt with the sale of the homes of former MP Neil Hamilton and controversial historian David Irving, said: ‘What happens where the bankrupts resist the applications for possession and sale and it goes over three years? What happens where they don’t disclose property to use and we find out after the three years?’

Brittain said the implication of Johnson’s proposals was that bankrupts would benefit from appreciation in property values and not creditors.

R3 spokesman and personal bankruptcy specialist Peter Sargent said: ‘The original proposal is absolutely ridiculous. There needs to be some proper mechanism to protect the debtor and the trustee who is acting for creditors.’

He added there is a danger bankrupts suffering from ‘ostrich syndrome’ would try to keep the family home by ignoring the problem. He proposed allowing the bankrupt to put forward an alternative proposal if his trustee is delaying the realisation of the home or freezing the value of the property at the original price it was when the bankruptcy order was made.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer