New money-laundering rules have botched important trust definitions so badly
that professional advisers would be hard pressed to understand them, the Society
for Trusts and Estate Practitioners has reiterated.
In a letter to Accountancy Age, David Harvey, the chief executive of
STEP, said the ‘beneficial
ownership’ rules bore no relation to reality.
‘STEP has been working to find a solution to the problem of defining
‘beneficial ownership’ in the regulations as it relates to trusts, but where it
presently has no real meaning. STEP has taken opinion from two QCs which say
that it is impossible for even a professional adviser to decide who a beneficial
Keith Johnston of STEP added: ‘The regulations ask advisers to verify the 25%
owner of a discretionary trust. There’s no such thing.’
Advisers will have to define that ‘owner’ to be sure if they need to make
money laundering reports.
Harvey wrote: ‘[Advisers] will not know who to conduct due diligence on, for
the millions of trusts they work with, potentially exposing them before law
Johnston said the body is working with the Treasury to iron out the
"The whole idea of HMRC officials supplying confidential information about individuals to the media on a non-attributable basis is, or should be, a matter of serious concern," say Supreme Court judges
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy
A senior MP has questioned the impact of HMRC’s decision to undertake yet another radical overhaul of its internal structure
The Apple Tax situation; Accountants replaced by robots; and The Accountancy Age Top 50+50; all discussed by head of editorial Kevin Reed