UK seeks less detailed auditing of EU programmes

UK seeks less detailed auditing of EU programmes

Britain prefers a system of 'benefit-cost audits rather than transaction-tracing audits'

The British government is opposing widespread individual transaction checks
within European Union (EU) funded programmes, by the EU’s Court of Auditors.

The comments have come as the European Commission is pressing for member
states to release more detail about EU-funded programmes that are managed
nationally, such as agricultural subsidies.

Britain, however, appears to want less detailed checks, not more. In comments
on the most recent Court of Auditors annual report (for the EU’s 2004 accounts),
the UK government has proposed that EU audits be ‘more as system and
benefit-cost audits rather than transaction-tracing audits’.

It continued: ‘Transaction tracing audits bring up specific timed errors,
often of minor amounts, which when extrapolated can make it look as though the
whole programme is in error. These errors are also often corrected later…’

France has similar criticisms, although it avoids recommending a solution,
saying of the Court’s sampling methods: ‘General conclusions are drawn from
findings relating to a very limited number of isolated operations, many of which
involve very small amounts’.

And Germany questioned the cost-effectiveness of EU spending assessments,
period. It proposes an audit of the audits: ‘The cost of management and control
systems in member states should be assessed by the [European] Commission to
ensure that cost is proportionate to the results obtained.’

Denmark called for more cooperation between the Court and national supreme
audit institutions, a line supported by the EU financial watchdog itself, which
agreed there should be an ‘appropriate balance between costs and benefits’ in
statements of assurance.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource