PracticeAuditGovernance code for audit firms released by ICAEW

Governance code for audit firms released by ICAEW

Non-executive directors among measures in new governance code

FRC chairman Sir Christopher Hogg

After decades spent promoting the virtues of good governance, the audit
industry will have to prove that it practices what it preaches with the release
of a corporate code.

The 18-page document represents the first codification of audit governance
standards, anywhere in the world.

Adherence will be voluntary, but encouraged by the same “comply or explain”
system which has proven successful among corporate companies.

Some see it as Enron’s final legacy, a code which sets down on paper the
governance structure and practices audit firms should follow.

Designed for the UK’s largest eight audit firms, which together audit 95% of
companies listed on the main market of the London Stock Exchange, the code will
place pressure on firms to adopt many of the the same corporate practices as
their clients.

With non-executive directors, internal controls, whistle blowing policies and
audited financial statements, much of the code is codifying standard practice,
however, some measures might trigger some uncomfortable change for the firms,
which all welcomed the code and committed themselves to implementing it.

In the minds of the code’s drafters is the possibility of a Big Four
collapse, which some estimate would leave as many as 20% of the 7,200 largest
businesses in the G20 without an auditor.

The code, compiled by the ICAEW and encouraged by the Financial Reporting
Council, grew out of this fear and, it is hoped, will bring a stabilising
element to the industry.

Sir Christopher Hogg, chairman of the FRC, applauded ICAEW’s thorough
approach to the project and welcomed the code.

The code is likely to be one of the lasting legacies of Sir Christopher, who
steps down in May.

“The code lays foundations for the future and rightly reflects the belief
that prescriptive requirements are not a substitute for effective governance and
that good governance complements regulation,” he said.

“I strongly encourage audit firms and investors to grasp the opportunities
the Code presents to strengthen their dialogue.”

Further reading:

Wyman
warns over non-exec restrictions

Related Articles

The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

Audit The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

1w Carl Johnson, Stephensons
FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

Audit FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

Accounting Firms FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PwC fined a record £5.1m by the FRC over RSM Tenon audit

Audit PwC fined a record £5.1m by the FRC over RSM Tenon audit

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
BDO overtakes KPMG to take top spot in AIM auditor rankings

Accounting Firms BDO overtakes KPMG to take top spot in AIM auditor rankings

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Demand for audit skills exceeding supply

Audit Demand for audit skills exceeding supply

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC launches investigation into PwC over BT audits

Accounting Firms FRC launches investigation into PwC over BT audits

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter