TaxPersonal TaxRevenue U-turn on builders’ tax

Revenue U-turn on builders' tax

Concessions will allow self-employed construction workers to be paid gross next year. Phillip Inman reports

The Inland Revenue has caved in to demands for a relaxation of tough rules designed to stamp out bogus self-employment in the building industry.

Major building companies immediately attacked the Revenue’s climbdown, saying it caused unnecessary confusion and extra costs only a short time before the new rules for building workers were due to come into force.

The concessions will allow thousands of self-employed workers to be paid gross wages who would otherwise have had to accept payments after deductions for income tax and national insurance contributions.

In June, the Revenue announced building workers would need to earn more than #30,000 before they would qualify for a CIS5 certificate, which would entitle the holder to gross payments. The certificate is due to take effect from 31 July next year and replaces the current 714 certificate.

Last week, it announced private income could be included in the turnover calculation and not just work covered by the certificate. The decision will allow thousands of workers to boost their ‘qualifying’ income and gain a CIS5 certificate.

Revenue officers, who said the old 714 system was widely abused, have held discussions with industry representatives for the last three years with the aim of designing a new tax scheme. It was estimated that between 200,000 and 600,000 of the one million building industry workers would be forced out of self-employment into accepting payments after tax or full-time employment.

Liz Bridge, tax expert at the Construction Confederation, believed the latest move would increase the number of workers eligible for certificates by 100,000. She said her organisation was disappointed the Revenue had rushed through the changes without consulting her organisation.

‘They have changed the scheme radically at the last moment and that adds a great deal of uncertainty. We believe it will add to the costs of the larger contractors who will effectively manage the scheme.’

A Revenue spokesman said the costs of compliance would be the same under the new scheme. He denied the Revenue had failed to consult widely about the changes.

Related Articles

Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

Personal Tax Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

Personal Tax Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

2m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

Personal Tax What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

5m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

7m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

9m Alia Shoaib, Reporter