TaxPersonal TaxGAAR delay to 2000

GAAR delay to 2000

Revenue defers April 1999 deadline and says avoidance rule to apply only to companies. Chris Quick reports.

The Inland Revenue has delayed the introduction of a general anti-avoidance rule until 2000 at the earliest.

The Revenue, which on Monday unveiled its long-awaited consultative document exploring how a GAAR would work, also said it would hold further consultation on the precise wording of any rule before introducing it.

Tax experts expressed relief at the Revenue’s cautious approach, but said some aspects of the consultation paper were disappointing.

Richard Baron, deputy head of the policy unit at the Institute of Directors, said: ‘The basic definition of tax avoidance is heavily skewed in favour of the Revenue. It would be easy for the Revenue to show avoidance, so the burden of proof would fall on companies.’ He welcomed the fact that a GAAR would initially apply only to the companies.

But he was worried by a proposed clearance system, where companies could submit transaction details to the Revenue for confirmation they would not be subject to a GAAR.

The Revenue said it was considering charging for these clearances and would undertake to give them in a 30-day period.

Baron added: ‘If you are looking at a company takeover, 30 days is far too long.’ His comments were echoed by PwC partner John Whiting, a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s technical committee, who described the paper as fundamentally disappointing. He expressed concerns over the 30-day turnaround time for clearances and that companies would have to pay for this.

But Whiting said it was good the Revenue seemed willing to have a ‘long hard consult’ on the issue. This intention was reflected in comments by Dawn Primarolo, financial secretary to the Treasury, as she unveiled the proposals.

She said: ‘The government is determined to make the tax system fairer.

A GAAR might have an important role to play in achieving that. But it’s important to ensure that such a rule, which would be the next step in tax law, would be effective and efficient in its application.’

See Leader Taxpayers have rights as well

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

13h Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter