PracticeConsultingFirm up private bill

Firm up private bill

Bodies call for a tighter definition of public interest in current whistle-blowing bill. Andreina Cordani reports.

Professional bodies have backed Richard Shepherd’s private members bill, aimed at protecting employees who blow the whistle on malpractice at work, but say measures could go much further.

The English ICA claimed the Aldridge Brownhills MP’s bill should be extended to make all confidentiality clauses in contracts null and void when they apply to valid whistle-blowing, so that accountants could be free to report fraud or malpractice with far less risk to their jobs.

Tony Wedgwood, chairman of the institute’s working party on whistle-blowing, said: ‘The bill has gone for the easiest option by just extending unfair dismissal laws. It’s a good start, and it sets the tone that whistle-blowers should not be victimised, but it does not go far enough to protect them.’

The institute also argued the proposed compensation level set by the bill is too low. Wedgwood added: ‘A compensation limit of around #30,000 for unjustified dismissals is hardly going to mean a lot to someone on a #50,000 salary.’

John Davies, senior technical officer for ACCA, agreed: ‘If such a low ceiling is put on compensation levels, it will lessen the effectiveness of the bill in encouraging the uncovering of fraud.’

The Scots ICA said limited compensation will not take into account the ‘whispering damnation’ which surrounds a sacked whistle-blower and prevents him from finding a new job. Tom McMorrow, the Scots director of legal services, said: ‘We’ve had quite a few cases where someone has done the right thing, been sacked and unable to find another job. That is a trap from which whistle-blowers need protection.’

ACCA also criticised the bill’s definition of what information is, or is not, in the public interest, claiming it was too loose and would lead to confusion.

‘We want to be able to advise our members on the specific areas covered by the bill, and for this the bill needs to refine its vague definition of what is in the public interest.’

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer