RegulationAccounting StandardsInternational investors wade in to segments row

International investors wade in to segments row

International Corporate Governance Network writes to the EC over company segments reporting standard

The embattled standard on the reporting of company segments has hit a new
roadblock, after an international body of investors controlling more than $10
trillion (£5 trillion) weighed in to the row.

The International Corporate Governance
Network
– whose members come from 38 different countries – has written to
the European Commission over the plans, significantly broadening the coalition
attacking the standard.

The plans have so far been opposed mainly by European and particularly UK
investors.

The group, led by executive director Ann Simpson, argues that the standard
‘confuses the corporate governance paradigm and muddies responsibility by
referring to management rather than boards’.

‘If the chain of accountability – of the boards to shareholders, and
management to the boards – is to be effective, the management must be
accountable to the boards,’ she said.

In their letter, the group stated their opposition to the way in which IFRS 8
allowed management the defining role in financial reporting.

‘By specifically referring to management, rather than boards, IFRS 8 is
perhaps as much a corporate governance standard as an accounting standard. If
there is any risk that with IFRS 8, financial reporting can amount to a “paper
passing” exercise decided by management under the sanctity of IFRS 8, then the
matters should be addressed by the EU,’ the letter stated.

The IASB has been
rattled by opposition from UK investors who have, alongside NGOs, charities and
pressure groups, led criticism of the standard. Tax campaigners want country-
by-country reporting of tax problems.

The ASB, which held a meeting to establish a consensus, has also been drawn
into the row. It has been accused of presenting opponents as agreeing with the
standard and urging the EC to adopt it when they did not agree with it.

The ASB has also been accused of excluding pressure groups who were present
at the meeting, and of giving each person present a vote – even when more than
one person from an organisation was present.

Richard Murphy, representative of NGO collective,
Publish
What You Pay
, said: ‘This is about more than IFRS 8. What is happening here
is a question of whose interests accounts are prepared for and what exactly
accounting standards are meant to do,’ said Murphy.

The EC has provisionally deferred the adoption of the standard.

Related Articles

Demystifying GDPR for accountants

Accounting Standards Demystifying GDPR for accountants

1w Ellen Temperton, Lewis Silkin
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
The great professional services shake-up

Accounting Standards The great professional services shake-up

3m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
What do clients actually want from an accountant?

Accounting Standards What do clients actually want from an accountant?

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

Accounting Standards Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

4m Alison Conley
Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

Accounting Standards Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

Accounting Standards The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

5m DAC Beachcroft
IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

Accounting Standards IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter