Despite lacking the votes needed to merge with CIPFA, ICAEW chief executive
Eric Anstee has claimed a ‘mandate’ to work with the public sector institute and
other bodies towards the rationalisation of the UK accountancy profession.
As the dust settled on Tuesday’s narrow defeat by 540 votes, the ICAEW, CIPFA
and CIMA pledged talks on closer collaboration. ACCA has also said that it wants
stronger links with CIPFA.
‘We have a sufficient mandate to continue to discuss consolidation. I don’t
think six institutes is the way forward,’ Anstee told Accountancy Age when the
vote was announced.
He said the institute would ‘love to have a public services faculty’ and
talks on CIPFA collaboration would continue. ‘We must get as much through as
possible without integration.’
CIMA has kept the door open for a merger with the ICAEW. CIMA president Ian
Christison said the institute would continue with its own strategy until it
heard a response from the ICAEW over earlier points that had stalled its part in
the merger plans.
ACCA chief executive Allen Blewitt called for greater co-operation between
his institute and CIPFA. ‘We will happily talk to CIPFA about how we can help
them to deliver a top-quality service that public sector finance professionals
need in the 21st century,’ he said.
But a spokesman for the body denied it was planning to court CIPFA over a
On a dramatic day at both Guildhall and Chartered Accountants’ Hall, where
the institutes’ votes were revealed simultaneously, the ICAEW fell agonisingly
short of the two-thirds majority required to push the merger through 65.7%
were in favour of the merger while 34.3% were against.
Despite the result, the ICAEW hailed the voting turnout as ‘historic’, after
56,326 members participated a record 44% turnout.
Of the 5,636 CIPFA members who voted, 86.7% were in favour of the merger.
Bruce Lawson, who campaigned against the merger, repeated his call for Anstee to
step down. ‘We want to make sure a merger vote never happens again. We have the
CCAB to represent the profession,’ he said.
Recriminations between the ICAEW and ICAS, which have staged a running battle
over the proposed name of any merged institute, began within hours of the vote.
Anstee slammed ICAS for ‘exposing’ the issue that would have seen the ‘super
institute’ called the Institute of Chartered Accountants. ‘I think it was done
in a way that was unpleasant to the profession,’ he said.
The issue of the suggested name ‘arose prematurely…it was an issue for the
privy council’, agreed CIPFA chief executive Steve Freer.
Des Hudson, ICAS chief executive, said ICAS would be ‘seeking to clarify’
that the super-institute name would ‘no longer be an issue and will not be
Send your views on the merger vote to
Engineering and technology executives have voiced concerns over the government’s industrial strategy and the need to fill the R&D funding and long-term investment gap in a post-Brexit Britain
This year’s Finance Act is 649 pages, the second longest recorded, and highlights the increasing complexity for taxpayers of an ever expanding tax code
The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and the CIPFA have launched an introductory guide for leaders on integrated thinking and reporting
Accountancy Age is delighted to reveal the shortlists for the 2016 British Accountancy Awards