TaxPersonal TaxForeign companies loophole closed

Foreign companies loophole closed

The Inland Revenue today closed with immediate effect a loophole that allows UK companies to avoid paying tax in the UK.

The Revenue said its measures – widely forecast before the Budget – would stop ‘a wholly artificial tax avoidance scheme’.

The rules governing controlled foreign companies – namely those not resident in the UK but controlled by individuals or companies that are – are designed to stop UK companies avoiding UK tax by diverting income to subsidiaries situated in low tax regimes.

Essentially the rules ensure UK parent companies of CFCs are charged an amount equal to the profits that would otherwise avoid tax.

However the Revenue said many companies had entered into artificial tax avoidance schemes designed to benefit from an ‘acceptable distribution policy’ exemption, which removes the clause if dividends accounting for at least 90% of company profits are paid to persons in the UK.

These schemes usually involve money going round in a circle from a UK financial concern, such as a bank, to a CFC owned by one of its UK clients and then back to the bank again. The cycle can effectively remove a tax liability.

Today’s move provides that dividends paid by a CFC to UK companies that can offset losses in this way (often banks or insurance companies) do not count towards the ADP exemption if they are involved in a UK tax avoidance scheme.

But the Revenue also acknowledged that existing rules were too tough on some companies that are controlled through a chain of one or more foreign holding companies.

Ernst & Young international tax partner Heather Devine said it would surprise no one that the ‘rather elderly loophole’ had been closed.

PricewaterhouseCoopers corporate tax expert Derek Jenkins said: We’ve been amazed that this hasn’t been closed before. It was so obviously a loophole and was widely marketed by a number of banks. It clearly exploited the rules but was totally effective.’

But he added: ‘People will be disappointed. When you are winning you rather want it to carry on.’

Links

Budget 2001

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

2d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter