PracticeConsultingNuclear fallout

Nuclear fallout

PAC criticises DTI for its 'complacent' management of the privatisation of AEA. Kathy Greene reports

The Public Accounts Committee this week accused the Department of Trade and Industry of ‘surprising complacency’ over the loss of more than #100m during the 1996 privatisation of AEA Technology.

PAC members said the atomic energy authority sale was one of the most unfortunate instances of the taxpayer being short-changed ever witnessed and accused the DTI of deliberately ignoring advice from the Treasury and the National Audit Office on the case for phasing the sale.

The DTI was criticised for maintaining a share value of 280p, although AEA shares were valued at 323.5p on the first day of trading, rising to 617.5p. DTI permanent secretary Michael Scholar said he considered the sale a success but said the DTI should have considered phasing and overseen the allocation of shares.

‘We acted on advice from our brokers, Cazenove, on the price of shares. The government had a fixed policy to sell the shares and phasing was not explicitly considered but with hindsight we fully acknowledge the benefits of it,’ said Scholar.

David Davis, chairman of the committee, said he was concerned the department had not overseen the allocation of 68 million shares to Cazenove or Schroders, who acted as advisers during the sale.

The PAC criticised Cazenove for making a profit of #24m. Davis was also critical of success fees of #1.8m paid to Schroders, whose profits from the shares were 34 times the success fees.

‘We admit we should have overseen share allocation but did not see it as a conflict of interest for Cazenove or Schroders. We underestimated the value of the company; it certainly exceeded everyone’s expectations,’ said Scholar.

But the committee said there were enough signals for the DTI to avoid undervaluing the company. ‘There was sufficient warning from the Treasury and the NAO, plus there was a rush of interest close to the end of the sale. We are concerned that the advisers set the price, took success fees and allocated shares for themselves,’ said Davis.

‘It’s hardly likely they would have bought such a significant amount of shares in a pessimistic option,’ he added.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer