TaxAdministrationGLO revelations would ‘harm UK in Europe’

GLO revelations would 'harm UK in Europe'

Potential cost of 'group litigation orders' was so serious that Whitehall feared disclosing them would threaten Britain’s position in EU

The potential costs of challenges to UK tax rules under European law, through
several ‘group litigation orders’, were so serious that Whitehall feared
disclosing them would threaten Britain’s position in the European Union.

The revelation emerges from papers just released by the information
commissioner in rejecting a Freedom of Information request to disclose the GLOs’
estimated costs.

Releasing figures, the government argued, could ‘lead to a press campaign
against the UK involvement in Europe and the reach of the European Courts’.

Disclosure would also ‘call into question the government’s adherence to its
own fiscal rules, which could increase the cost of borrowing’.

Speculation that taxes would have to be raised would have deterred inward
investment, while disclosure might have undermine confidence in the government
to manage the economy, causing ‘political instability’.

This apocalyptic vision appears to support speculation that, had the ECJ
taken the uncompromising stand against ‘discriminatory’ tax rules that many
pundits predicted, costs could have hit £20bn.

In one case, the franked investment income GLO, HM Revenue & Customs had
revealed in court an estimated potential hit of £5bn.

The information commissioner was eventually swayed by the prospect that
releasing highly uncertain and ‘worst case’ estimates could distort investor
decisions towards companies with claims under the GLOs.

A lawyer familiar with the claims, however, said the fears of massive tax
losses to the Treasury through the ECJ had been massively overblown.

‘I know a number of these cases and there was nothing to explain where the
massive numbers were coming from,’ the lawyer said.

Peter Cussons, international tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said the
government had limited losses by defending its ground doggedly, and had also
been aided by a shift in the stance of the ECJ away from favouring taxpayers.

‘The predictions of Armageddon have not wholly materialised, but there have
been major ructions

with the proposed changes to the taxation of foreign company profits so I
think we are sitting at deuce,’ Cussons said.

Related Articles

HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC issues updated Trusts Registration Service guidance

Administration HMRC issues updated Trusts Registration Service guidance

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
Are you ready for the Trusts Registration Service?

Administration Are you ready for the Trusts Registration Service?

3m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
Advisers bullish despite Brexit concerns

Accounting Standards Advisers bullish despite Brexit concerns

1y Fraser Simpson, Reporter
Brexit: Five questions accountants should be asking

Accounting Firms Brexit: Five questions accountants should be asking

1y Fraser Simpson, Reporter
UK votes to leave EU – accountancy profession reacts

Accounting Firms UK votes to leave EU – accountancy profession reacts

1y Fraser Simpson, Reporter