FTSE-100 slam pensions report

FTSE-100 slam pensions report

Report criticises FTSE firms over pensions costs disclosure.

FTSE-100 companies this week slammed an actuary’s report on pensions costs disclosure and robustly defended their level of disclosure in reports and accounts.

Of the FTSE-100, BP, Lucas Varity and Sun Life & Provincial came in for most criticism for failing to include ‘clear disclosure of four key items which are crucial to understanding the figures’.

Ian Richardson, the group company treasurer of Sun life & Provincial Holdings, said the author of the report, Lane Clark & Peacock, only looked for particular areas of disclosure. ‘I would dispute it on two things,’ he said. ‘I think we made sure there was adequate disclosure on our accounts.’

BP said it had made no decision to mislead or to be less transparent and said it had attempted to verify Lane Clark & Peacock’s findings in the report. BP added: ‘Regrettably, Lane Clark & Peacock has not availed itself of this offer.’

The survey also highlighted the fact that ICI’s pension cost, as a proportion of pre-tax profits, was as high as 34%. An ICI spokesman said the company’s high figure reflects the large number of ex-employees prior to rationalisation and demergers. He said: ‘Against profits, it is not particularly brilliant.’

Richard Abramson and Bob Scott, partners at actuary Lane Clark & Peacock that drew up the firm’s fifth annual survey into FTSE-100 company pension reporting, also criticised the Accounting Standards Board for failure of SSAP 24 to promote disclosure.

The report said: ‘It has been evident for some time that SSAP 24 has failed in its objectives and a review of the standard is long overdue.’

Allan Cook, technical director of the ASB, said: ‘We think pensions is a priority subject. We’ve been held back by the international debate but we’re interested in pressing on now.’

Abolition of advance corporation tax credits was blamed for making pension provision more expensive to companies. Abramson said the ACT change ‘represents a major cost to UK pension schemes and the companies that pay for them.’

Related Articles

Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

Legal Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

Personal Tax Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

Personal Tax Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

4m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

Personal Tax What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

7m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

9m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

9m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer