Brexit & EconomyPoliticsWhitehall ‘gagging’ clauses to be banned

Whitehall 'gagging' clauses to be banned

Commons Liaison Committee rails against government departments which keep commercial arrangements under wraps.

So-called ‘gagging’ clauses in PFI and other contracts between government
departments and other public bodies and industry could be effectively outlawed
if the most influential Parliamentary committee has its way.

The Commons Liaison Committee comprising the chairman of most other
committees has called for an extension of provisions that allow the National
Audit Office to examine arrangements claimed to be ‘commercially confidential’
to committees tasked with monitoring individual departments.

The committee said: ‘It is inherent in the House’s right to control
expenditure that the House and select committees should have access to
sufficient information about PFI contracts to make possible an assessment of
whether they offer value for money, of the extent to which public bodies are
locked into long-term commitments and of the extent to which risk is transferred
to the private sector or retained within the public sector.’

The report, which demands a major overhaul to improve Parliamentary scrutiny,
also called for MPs to see the result of Gershon Efficiency Reviews, previously
regarded as confidential but which committees have begun to have access in
confidence.

It said claims of confidentiality were also a problem for committees looking
into major IT projects and noted that the Information Commissioner and
Information Tribunal have rejected arguments that contracts between a public
authority and a commercial organisation are wholly exempt from disclosure unless
there were identified prejudicial consequences.

The MPs welcomed a Treasury-lead drive to align the three financial control
systems used to oversee public spending: departmental budgets resulting from
spending reviews, estimates seeking annual Parliamentary authority for
expenditure and annual resource accounts.

They said: ‘Had such a system been deliberately designed, it could fairly be
assumed that it had been set up with the specific purpose of making it
impossible to hold the government and departments to account.’

Related Articles

5 key takeaways from Theresa May’s Florence speech

Brexit 5 key takeaways from Theresa May’s Florence speech

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
UK at risk of Brexit talent brain-drain

People Practice UK at risk of Brexit talent brain-drain

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Brexit essentials: this week's round-up

Politics Brexit essentials: this week's round-up

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Government publishes post-Brexit customs arrangements policy paper

Politics Government publishes post-Brexit customs arrangements policy paper

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Increased government spending partly offset by high tax revenue

Governance Increased government spending partly offset by high tax revenue

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Less than a third of UK businesses have made formal Brexit plans

Politics Less than a third of UK businesses have made formal Brexit plans

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Nicky Morgan elected Chair of the Treasury Committee

Politics Nicky Morgan elected Chair of the Treasury Committee

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter