The US taxman has introduced less ‘draconian’ transfer pricing rules for
multinationals, but has not removed all restrictions, say advisers.
The Internal Revenue Service and US Treasury have eased rules around cost
sharing arrangements that provide extra flexibility in transfer pricing schemes,
which apply to companies and their foreign partners that share in the cost of
developing intanginble property.
The new rules relax how these properties are valued.
‘They’re not draconian now, but they are still very restrictive,’ Ernst
& Young director of transfer pricing controversy services David Canale told
‘They have a framework called the investor model. They provide more
flexibility in how it is implemented versus how they described it in the 2005
regulations, but it’s still a fairly restrictive interpretation of how you value
this intellectual property. The IRS view is that this establishes an
arm’s-length price. They provide more guidance outlining methods that they
consider provide more of an arm’s-length approach.’
Lord Howard Leigh of Hurley discusses the government’s initiatives to mitigate tax avoidance and evasion
Top 50+50: Demand for tax advisory services remains high, but fee pressure is expected in relation to compliance services
The demand for tax advisory services remains high and this looks to continue; but fee pressure is expected in relation to compliance services as the “Making Tax Digital” initiative is rolled out,
While some resistance to change is to be expected, the degree of controversy surrounding HMRC's Making Tax Digital proposals has surprised the government
Kevin Reed discusses the worrying findings from HMRC on micro-businesses' problems handling Real-Time Information, and the latest thoughts on how accountants can provide value-added services