Investors wary of liability plan

Investors wary of liability plan

Representatives from the Big Four issue proposal for a new law to limit auditors' liability amid concern that auditors will face a wave of litigation from investors and liquidators who are trying to recover losses from big company failures

Peter Wyman, PwC

Peter Wyman, PwC: compromis solution

A proposal by leading accounting firms for a new law to limit auditors’
liability for company failures will face opposition from leading investors and
shareholder advisers.

Representatives from the Big Four firms met officials from the Department for
Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform last week amid concern that auditors
will face a wave of litigation from investors and liquidators who are trying to
recover losses from big company failures.

Currently, an auditor can be sued for unlimited losses when a company
collapses, even if they were judged to be only partly to blame. Company
directors can limit an auditor’s liability, with the agreement of shareholders,
although no big companies are thought to have done so.

Michael McKersie, assistant director, capital markets, at the
Association of British
Insurers
, whose members control about 15% of the UK stockmarket, said it was
sympathetic to the principle of reform of liability for auditors.

But he questioned whether ‘hard wiring’ proportionate liability into UK law
was a wise move, citing uncertainty over how courts would interpret the rule
when deciding the damages auditors.

‘Auditors do have a legitimate concern that they are the deep pockets in the
current situation,’ McKersie said.

‘Proportionate liability is less detrimental to shareholders than previous
[suggestions] such as monetary caps on liability, however, we have not yet
considered the implications of proportionate liability being compulsory.’

Other options for auditor liability include holding the auditor liable to no
more than two times the total damages that would be directly attributable to the
auditor, McKersie added.

A spokesman for Pirc,
the UK body which advises UK shareholders on corporate governance issues, said
it opposed making auditor liability statutory.

Peter Wyman, head of public policy at
PricewaterhouseCoopers, has
said one compromise solution, which might satisfy US regulators, would be to
limit auditor’s liability in law to the proportion of their client’s loss which
they are responsible for.

The SEC last week declined
to comment on the Big Four proposal.

Related Articles

FRC reports an “unacceptable deterioration” in KPMG audit quality

Audit FRC reports an “unacceptable deterioration” in KPMG audit quality

14h Alia Shoaib, Reporter
PwC fined a record £10m over BHS audit

Audit PwC fined a record £10m over BHS audit

7d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
PwC to net £50m from Carillion insolvency

Accounting Firms PwC to net £50m from Carillion insolvency

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Deloitte faces disciplinary action over Autonomy accounts scandal

Audit Deloitte faces disciplinary action over Autonomy accounts scandal

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

Audit Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

Audit FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

Audit Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

Audit Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter