The Inland Revenue invited hundreds of tax advisers to its Lincoln training centre last weekend in a bid to convince them that the hotly disputed convention on company prosecutions did not undermine the Hansard rule on tax disputes, writes Phillip Inman.
The #475-a-head conference was dominated by irate tax advisers anxious to hear why the convention should not deter them from making disclosures on behalf of their clients. The convention is an agreement between authorities such as the Revenue, Customs & Excise, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office, to co-ordinate prosecutions.
It sparked a furious row between tax advisers and the Revenue after advisers realised clients could face prosecution after previously settling with the Revenue.
Head of the special compliance office Frank Branagan issued a statement that repeated the statement by the solicitor general on the Hansard ruling, published exclusively in Accountancy Age (21 May, page 2).
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy