TaxPersonal TaxTax treatmen of widowers under fire

Tax treatmen of widowers under fire

The parliamentary ombudsman has received 72 complaints referred by 65 different MPs about the tax treatment of widowers.

Link: Budget 2002 – Widow of opportunity

This follows two settlements in 1999 and 2000 where widowers were given payments equivalent to the Widows Benefits Tax Allowance, despite the fact that the claimants were not legally entitled to the concession.

In both cases the case had been taken to the European Court of Human Rights. In November 1999, the Inland Revenue agreed to make Christopher Crossland at payment equivalent to Widows Bereavement Tax Allowance, to which widows were not legally entitled. In July 2000, the former Department of Social Security, now the Department for Work and Pensions, agreed a similar settlement of David Cornwell’s claim for a payment equivalent to Widow’s Benefits, to which widowers were not legally entitled.

Parliamentary ombudsman Ann Abraham said in a report called Equality under the law? the treatment of widowers by the Inland Revenue and the Department for Work Pensions’ that she had been inundated with complaints as a result. She said: ‘My office has to date received 66 complaints that the Inland Revenue acted unfairly by refusing to treat other claims in the same way as they had dealt with Mr Crossland’s case, and a further six complaints the Department of Work and Pensions did not treat other cases in the same way as they had treated Mr Cornwell. Complaints have been referred by 65 different members of parliament.’

The ombudsman investigated two complaints but abandoned them after she decided that the injustice derived from the legislation rather than maladministration. She added that changes to the rules in the Finance Act and the Welfare and Pensions Act 1999 had removed any distinction between the way in which men and women who were widowed were treated for tax and social security purposes. She prepared the report to help ensure that future legislation was not discriminatory.

Related Articles

HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

1m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

Legal Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter