Buckley said ‘Mr D’ was entitled to the factual information which made up the bulk of the report by the Taunton VAT Office which handled his case – this after ‘Mr D’ had lost appeals to both the VAT Tribunal and to the High Court.
Customs had earlier refused on the ground that the report contained internal opinion, advice and recommendation.
But Buckley, who revealed the three-page report contained an account of the way the papers had been dealt with, an account of the background to the case and a review of the papers, as well as comment, opinion and advice, said there was no reason why ‘Mr D’ should not have an edited version.
He, however, ruled against an accountant’s request to see all the correspondence between the Adjudicator and the Inland Revenue relating to a complaint by ‘Mr and Mrs B’ about the way the Revenue had handled their affairs.
The Ombudsman said to do so would harm ‘frank and candid informal discussions’ between the Adjudicator’s staff and the Revenue – the Adjudicator had earlier ruled against the couple’s complaint.
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy