In its final report, the company law review group recommended that directors’ residential addresses remain in the public domain, unless directors are ‘at genuine risk of violence’ as in the extreme case of the directors of Huntingdon Life Sciences.
But the Law Society claims no provision has been made in the company law review for ‘prospective’ directors to file a confidentiality order allowing them to withhold their home addresses.
Peter Wyman, a fervent critic of the disclosure of directors’ addresses and one of the UK’s most high profile accountants, said: ‘I think (the proposals) don’t go far enough.
‘There is no public interest in directors’ addresses being available. There is a growing trend for people being intimidated at their homes.’
Wyman warned of growing security concerns for the children of directors as well as the issue of privacy.
There is a clear belief among many campaigners that the publication of personal details implies a right to protest outside the homes of directors as well as their place of work. It is a right they steadfastly reject.
Wyman, along with others concedes that directors names and addresses should still be submitted to Companies House so that the relevant authorities are able to contact the necessary people in the event of liquidation.
Despite the warnings, however, the government has indicated that it will implement the review’s recommendations.
HMRC breaches client confidentiality; and partner profits fall at EY. These stories and more discussed in Friday Afternoon Live
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group
Six new partners have been revealed by top ten firm Mazars