Microsoft has been ordered by the US Court of Appeals to file its first written brief in its anti-trust case on 27 November and said verbal arguments will begin in February.
The anti-trust trial against Microsoft was brought four years ago by the US Department of Justice, but still appears to have a long way to go pending appeals.
Judge Penfield Jackson ruled that Microsoft has a monopoly in the desktop operating system market and that it had abused that monopoly.
He has now ruled that as punishment, the software giant should be split up into two separate companies.
The November deadline is much sooner than Microsoft had requested, but it gives the software giant longer to prepare than if the court had followed the US government’s proposed schedule that final briefs be presented in December.
The Appeals Court has told Microsoft to present its arguments in a 150-page document detailing why it should not be broken into two companies.
The US Department of Justice must then reply in a 125-page document on 12 January. Microsoft has to reply in 75 pages on 29 January, and final briefs are expected to be held on 9 February.
Microsoft had originally asked the court for a 60-day extension before it files its first document and that the DoJ be given the same amount of time to reply.
This story first appeared on vnunet.com
New growth opportunities in Aberdeen, North East Scotland, are being invested in by Grant Thornton
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast