Link: Budget 2003 special
The Hansard procedure – a civil settlement offered by the Inland Revenue in the investigatory process – will no longer protect the taxpayer from criminal prosecution. Evidence gathered in a Hansard procedure will now be admissible in ‘various hearings’, meaning criminal prosecutions.
Alastair Kendrick, a director at Ernst & Young, warned taxpayers to be properly advised the moment they are contacted by the Special Compliance Office. ‘Anything you say or offer the Revenue from the outset will be permissible in court. It is a major, major change,’ he said.
A package of reforms to tackle tax fraud and avoidance was also unveiled, which the Revenue claims will ‘deliver significant savings’. This includes an investment of £66m over the next three years, in order to raise £1.6bn for government coffers. A similar amount is expected to be raised each year by Customs.
A number of specific avoidance schemes were targeted, in a move the paymaster general Dawn Primarolo described as ‘designed to modernise the way risks to revenue are assessed and managed by the Inland Revenue’.
Experts believe the Hansard change may be in contravention of European law.
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy