Link: Budget 2003 special
The Hansard procedure – a civil settlement offered by the Inland Revenue in the investigatory process – will no longer protect the taxpayer from criminal prosecution. Evidence gathered in a Hansard procedure will now be admissible in ‘various hearings’, meaning criminal prosecutions.
Alastair Kendrick, a director at Ernst & Young, warned taxpayers to be properly advised the moment they are contacted by the Special Compliance Office. ‘Anything you say or offer the Revenue from the outset will be permissible in court. It is a major, major change,’ he said.
A package of reforms to tackle tax fraud and avoidance was also unveiled, which the Revenue claims will ‘deliver significant savings’. This includes an investment of £66m over the next three years, in order to raise £1.6bn for government coffers. A similar amount is expected to be raised each year by Customs.
A number of specific avoidance schemes were targeted, in a move the paymaster general Dawn Primarolo described as ‘designed to modernise the way risks to revenue are assessed and managed by the Inland Revenue’.
Experts believe the Hansard change may be in contravention of European law.
Richard Le Tocq, head of Locate Guernsey, discusses the chancellor’s approach to high net worth individuals, and why relocation is increasingly attractive to HNWIs
The firm says that the U-turn 'does not alter the need for a fundamental review of the way we tax work' and that the current tax system is in need of reform
Legislation on the NICs changes to be brought forward in the autumn following publication of 'the full effects of the changes to Class 2 and Class 4' in the summer
Following chancellor Philip Hammond’s Spring Budget speech, we explore the key takeaways for businesses and individuals