More than two thirds (67%) of those questioned for this week’s Accountancy Age/Reed Finance Big Question said the chancellor’s set piece had not increased confidence in Labour’s ability to run the economy. Just 20% felt confidence had increased in light of the review.
Brown insisted that his plans for the next three years shunned the traditional pre-election spending spree. But his prudence failed to impress FDs. John Davies, of Moore & Blatch, said: ‘Until people see tangible benefits being delivered as a consequence of Labour’s spending plans I do not think confidence will change significantly’.
Others said they would ‘wait and see’ whether additional spending could be managed without increased taxes or very high borrowing levels.
Even those who thought that the review had boosted confidence only gave it a luke-warm welcome.
‘It’s only a step in the right direction, not arrival at the destination. Producing the numbers is the easy bit,’ said one.
The good news for the chancellor, according to John Buckley, FD of Sauter Automation, is that the government is effectively bullet proof.
‘If it’s a disaster, nobody will ever be able to pin it on them. When they can go to war and kill thousands of innocent people for entirely false reasons and get away with it, what can’t they get away with?’ he said.
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements