TaxCorporate TaxZero cost claim of new Arctic rules branded laughable

Zero cost claim of new Arctic rules branded laughable

Treasury's claims that new 'income shifting' rules will have zero associated costs have stunned advisers

The Treasury has estimated that the extra cost of tax rules introduced in the
wake of the Arctic Systems case will be zero ­ a claim that has stunned
advisers.

The government last week unveiled new rules to prevent ‘income shifting’, the
practice employed in many family businesses where dividend and salary
arrangements are structured to maximise the use of allowances and minimise tax.

Advisers have already said that the system will be a compliance nightmare,
and that the Treasury’s belief there will be no cost implications is laughable.

Under the rules, hundreds of thousands of businesses will have to keep
records of each family member’s efforts in the business to enable them to pay
the right tax. That is likely to mean timesheets and professional advice, not
just at the outset but each tax year.

The Treasury admits in its legislative consultation that businesses will face
a greater administration burden, but in its impact assessment within the same
document it calculated that businesses would face no annual cost for meeting
that burden.

‘It’s extraordinary, especially saying the opposite in its text,’ said Anne
Redston of the ICAEW tax faculty. ‘It defies understanding.’

Redston also heavily criticised the Treasury for claiming that an already
resource-strained HM Revenue & Customs would face ‘negligible’ costs in
policing the new regime.

The new rules place a burden of judgment on HMRC for each business, as clear
criteria for tax compliance were not included in the legislation.

‘Judgment-based enquiries are resource-intensive, so it’s astonishing the
cost to HMRC of policing this is described as negligible,’ she added.

The consultation for the new rules runs until 28 February 2008.

Related Articles

‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

1m Emma Rawson
R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

Corporate Tax R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

2m Sam Swansborough
Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Corporate Tax Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Guide to the UK corporate tax system

Corporate Tax Guide to the UK corporate tax system

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor