TaxCorporate TaxZero cost claim of new Arctic rules branded laughable

Zero cost claim of new Arctic rules branded laughable

Treasury's claims that new 'income shifting' rules will have zero associated costs have stunned advisers

The Treasury has estimated that the extra cost of tax rules introduced in the
wake of the Arctic Systems case will be zero ­ a claim that has stunned
advisers.

The government last week unveiled new rules to prevent ‘income shifting’, the
practice employed in many family businesses where dividend and salary
arrangements are structured to maximise the use of allowances and minimise tax.

Advisers have already said that the system will be a compliance nightmare,
and that the Treasury’s belief there will be no cost implications is laughable.

Under the rules, hundreds of thousands of businesses will have to keep
records of each family member’s efforts in the business to enable them to pay
the right tax. That is likely to mean timesheets and professional advice, not
just at the outset but each tax year.

The Treasury admits in its legislative consultation that businesses will face
a greater administration burden, but in its impact assessment within the same
document it calculated that businesses would face no annual cost for meeting
that burden.

‘It’s extraordinary, especially saying the opposite in its text,’ said Anne
Redston of the ICAEW tax faculty. ‘It defies understanding.’

Redston also heavily criticised the Treasury for claiming that an already
resource-strained HM Revenue & Customs would face ‘negligible’ costs in
policing the new regime.

The new rules place a burden of judgment on HMRC for each business, as clear
criteria for tax compliance were not included in the legislation.

‘Judgment-based enquiries are resource-intensive, so it’s astonishing the
cost to HMRC of policing this is described as negligible,’ she added.

The consultation for the new rules runs until 28 February 2008.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson