The claim, by Pirelli, was about the charging of ACT on international
dividends. Graham Aaronson QC, for Pirelli, said that the group should receive
an interest payment on the ACT as it was payable earlier than corporation tax.
The company received tax credits later instead, but Pirelli wanted both.
Justice Rimer, who heard the case, however, said this argument amounted to
nothing more than ‘the assertion that Pirelli must be entitled to the claimed
credit because it must be entitled to it’.
For the full judgment see
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The UK tax gap fell in 2014-15 to its lowest-ever level of 6.5%, revealed official statistics published today
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states