PracticeConsultingCOMMENT: PAUL VEVERS – FDs: board-status?

COMMENT: PAUL VEVERS - FDs: board-status?

There is a unique question arising in local government which does not have a parallel in the NHS nor, as far as we can see, among finance directors of equivalent-sized private sector organisations. That question is whether the finance director should be on the management board.

Private-sector FDs told us that it was unthinkable not to have financial management expertise on the board, and in the NHS, the FD is always on the board.

How does this question arise? In local government, by law an individual must be nominated as having responsibility for proper financial management (called a chief finance officer). That person must be an accountant and has a duty to make a report if he or she thinks the council is about to decide to incur expenditure unlawfully. The council is then prohibited from making payments until it has considered the report.

This power is rarely exercised – because on the vast majority of occasions explanation and persuasion deter councils from incurring expenditure unlawfully – but nonetheless, the power exists.

The statutory ‘chief finance officer’ does not have to be the same person as the FD. Although usually the roles are combined, about 50 out of 400 councils give a strategic financial brief to a board director, while allocating a more narrow financial administration role to the chief finance officer, who is not on the board. This arrangement can work well, providing that the person with the statutory duty is of sufficient calibre to make their voice heard when need be.

However, an increasing number of councils are discussing models in which the board comprises executive directors without specific functional responsibilities but with responsibility for specific programmes of work – such as economic development – which cut across traditional functions.

In one sense, this is a welcome development. Directors in local government have sometimes been guilty of taking too narrow a view of their role, defined by their own professional expertise.

However, effective use and control of public money and the need for clear accountability are such imperatives that, in the Audit Commission’s view, there must be one individual with responsibility for financial strategy and management and he or she must be on the board.

Paul Vevers is director of Audit Support at the Audit Commission.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

9m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

10m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

11m Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

10m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

10m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

10m Kevin Reed, Writer