TaxPersonal Tax‘Husband and wife tax’ under discussion

'Husband and wife tax' under discussion

Inland Revenue representatives have met with senior members of the accountancy profession to discuss controversial tax legislation Section 660.

Link: Pressure builds over draconian tax rules

As revealed by Accountancy Age on 3 July, highly influential members of the profession along with tax advisers and the major institutions hope to sway some influence with the government over what they see as unfair treatment of family-run businesses.

Section 660, the so-called husband and wife tax, penalises dividend-based payments to spouses if the receiving spouse does not own a significant share of the business.

While the legislation is not new, the professional bodies are concerned with the increasingly aggressive stance taken by the Revenue, specifically in the form of retrospective claims.

The Revenue can back-claim tax for up to six years in arrears if it feels tax has been avoided by the taxpayer. It is this six-year retrospective element of the Revenue’s tactics that have incensed most of the profession.

Accountancy Age understands the meeting took place yesterday hoping to make progress on the concerns over the legislation.

And one of taxpayers’ biggest worries is uncertainty because of claims that the Revenue has been less than clear with its stance on the legislation.

The Professional Contractors Group is also expected to be taking part in what are expected to be difficult negotiations. Earlier this year it wrote to paymaster general Dawn Primarolo asking her not to backdate the rules, and criticising the uncertainty of the Revenue’s approach.

A spokesman for the Inland Revenue confirmed a meeting had taken place yesterday ‘with some representative bodies’.

‘The meeting was designed to enable the bodies to explain any concerns they have about the way legislation at S660A should operate. The Department regularly meets with representative bodies to ensure legislation is being applied as it was intended to,’ the spokesman added.

Email David_Rae@vnu.co.uk

Related Articles

Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC collects record £5bn in inheritance tax

HMRC HMRC collects record £5bn in inheritance tax

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Making Tax Digital: What might HMRC’s penalties model look like?

Corporate Tax Making Tax Digital: What might HMRC’s penalties model look like?

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

Legal Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor